Computing.co.uk Jonathan Armstrong debunks the AI legal revolution

Computing.co.uk: Jonathan Armstrong debunks the AI legal revolution

2 Min Read

There has been lots of talk about AI revolutionising businesses and professions, including bold statements about the way the technology can eliminate lawyers. But does the hype match the reality?

One of the first known trials for AI in the law came to light in 2023, when lawyers in an airline liability case submitted a list of previously decided cases (lawyers calls them precedents) to a court in New York.

The move was in support of the lawyers’ argument that their case shouldn’t be struck out. The judge and the defendant’s lawyers struggled to find the cases cited. Why? Because ChatGPT had made them up.

Visit Debunking the AI legal revolution: What’s really happening? to read the full article.

Related Insights

Insights

Everything Compliance: A lesson on business ethics from handbags in South Korea

In this episode of the Everything Compliance podcast, Jonathan Armstrong discusses events in South Korea and how the gift of a handbag and allegations of corruption led to unheard of political instability. What lessons...

2 Min Read

Read More Everything Compliance: A lesson on business ethics from handbags in South Korea