Computing.co.uk Jonathan Armstrong debunks the AI legal revolution

Computing.co.uk: Jonathan Armstrong debunks the AI legal revolution

2 Min Read

There has been lots of talk about AI revolutionising businesses and professions, including bold statements about the way the technology can eliminate lawyers. But does the hype match the reality?

One of the first known trials for AI in the law came to light in 2023, when lawyers in an airline liability case submitted a list of previously decided cases (lawyers calls them precedents) to a court in New York.

The move was in support of the lawyers’ argument that their case shouldn’t be struck out. The judge and the defendant’s lawyers struggled to find the cases cited. Why? Because ChatGPT had made them up.

Visit Debunking the AI legal revolution: What’s really happening? to read the full article.

Related Insights

Insights

Criminal Compliance Podcast: Jonathan Armstrong on the current climate in investigations

Jonathan Armstrong recently joined Dr Christian Rosinus for an in-depth discussion on the shifting landscape of corporate investigations. In this episode of the Criminal Compliance Podcast, Jonathan draws on his...

2 Min Read

Read More Criminal Compliance Podcast: Jonathan Armstrong on the current climate in investigations